A product liability action filed in San Francisco alleges that “defendants failed to warn the plaintiff that playing with a sharp sword displayed in its store would result in the plaintiff slicing his hand when he attempted to place it back in its sheath.”





I'd agree that's tort law run amok, but only if that action survives a motion to dismiss. If the action is dismissed before discovery, then I'd say the system is working as it should.
Posted by: Cornellian | 07/29/2010 at 08:39 PM