Which would Warren Buffet's secretary prefer -- being made the national poster girl for tax victimhood or being paid more than a measley $60K a year for being personal assistant to one of the richest guys in the world?
Tom offers his guess answer in the rest of the post.
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
http://evilbloggerlady.blogspot.com/2012/01/crony-capitalism-it-is-good-to-be.html I thought it was determined she was making over $200,000 a year. $60,000 is good for a secretary in Omaha, although I would have guessed Warren Buffett's secretary would make more than that. I am guessing she has a few shares of Berkshire Hathaway too.
What a canard. I guess if you can't come up with a good counter argument, you resort to silly stuff like this.
It still doesn't change the core point of the argument, which is that capital gains should be taxed at equal (or heck, even near equal) levels as other income.
http://evilbloggerlady.blogspot.com/2012/01/crony-capitalism-it-is-good-to-be.html I thought it was determined she was making over $200,000 a year. $60,000 is good for a secretary in Omaha, although I would have guessed Warren Buffett's secretary would make more than that. I am guessing she has a few shares of Berkshire Hathaway too.
Posted by: Evi L. Bloggerlady | 01/29/2012 at 01:33 PM
Hmmm. You're such a grumpy old complainer that I wasn't sure who this post was going to be about. I was guessing Elizabeth Warren.
Posted by: D4n63rmOu53 | 01/30/2012 at 06:36 AM
What a canard. I guess if you can't come up with a good counter argument, you resort to silly stuff like this.
It still doesn't change the core point of the argument, which is that capital gains should be taxed at equal (or heck, even near equal) levels as other income.
Posted by: Steve Brennan | 01/30/2012 at 07:53 AM