Georgetown law professor Louis Michael Seidman has posted to SSRN a so-called Thought Experiment, purporting to be "Justice Antonin Scalia's long lost dissenting opinion in Brown v. Board of Education."
In my humble and constiutionally protected opinion, it is a piece of libelous shit by a far-left jackass.
As Seidman ought to know, Justice Scalia has in fact stated that "he stands with Justice Harlan, who dissented in Plessy v. Ferguson. He argues that the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits racial discrimination." People who claimed Scalia has said he would have dissented in Brown have been shown to have misquoted him (intentionally?).
Seidman's rant is not an amusing parody. It doesn't even try to be faithful to what Scalia might have said had he written in Brown. Instead, it is simply a thinly disguised way of accusing Scalia of being a racist neo-Confederate, which is a lie.
