I've blogged a lot about this case over the years, but I honestly don't have anything to add to Matt Levine's excellent diagnosis of the recent developments, which I think is spot on. So just go read him.
« The problem with co-authorship of academic work | Main | Is "fraud on the market" back on the agenda? »
03/07/2013
Comments
About PB.com and Prof B
Statistics
Awards
Recent Comments
- M Lister on Tweets re Jamie Dimon's Win
- Iam BarKahn on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion: IRS anti-Tea Party scandal gets real
- Iam BarKahn on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion: IRS anti-Tea Party scandal gets real
- Katall on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion: IRS anti-Tea Party scandal gets real
- Tregonsee on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion: IRS anti-Tea Party scandal gets real
- Max Lybbert on We are cited in Delaware
- Jellis585858 on Duties of corporate officers and directors
- Tano on FOOLED AGAIN
- Hal_RTFLC on FOOLED AGAIN
- Khorn on What I'd like for Christmas before the Apocalypse
Categories
- 10 Things I Think I Think
- Agency Partnership LLCs
- Books
- Business
- Cars
- Corporate Law
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Current Affairs
- Dept of Self-Promotion
- Economic Analysis Of Law
- Eliot Spitzer
- Executive Compensation
- Film
- Football
- Higher Ed
- Insider Trading
- LA and California
- Law
- Law School
- Lawyers
- Mergers and Takeovers
- Military Issues
- Music
- Photos
- Punditry
- Recipes
- Religion
- Science
- SCOTUS and Con Law
- Securities Regulation
- Shareholder Activism
- Sports
- Taxes
- Television
- The Economy
- The Good Life
- The Stock Market
- Travel
- Wall Street Reform
- Web/Tech
- Weblogs
- Wine
- Writing
