More to follow, but here's some initial reactions:
Insider Trading: Link to SCOTUS opinion on US v Salman. #insidertrading https://t.co/8ekTfeijYp
— Wall Street Gulliver (@insidergulliver) December 6, 2016
#SCOTUS holds that jury could infer that Salman personally benefited from making gift of confidential info to trading relative
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) December 6, 2016
#SCOTUS Salman opinion: To extent 2nd Circ in Newman held tipper must receive something of “pecuniary nature," rule inconsistent w/ Dirks.
— Alison Frankel (@AlisonFrankel) December 6, 2016
From the Profs: SCOTUS unanimously upholds broad interpretation of insider trading in Salman https://t.co/AN98L07yPC
— Terence Lenamon (@TerryLenamon) December 6, 2016
#SCOTUS rules unanimously for prosecutors in Salman v. U.S. #InsiderTrading case...Check out the argument @cspan https://t.co/8vn6Mlh7Fb
— Tanya Chattman (@ChattmanTanya) December 6, 2016
